<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Fat People Are Too Damn Sensitive</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.4d2.org/2008/12/18/fat-people-are-too-damn-sensitive/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.4d2.org/2008/12/18/fat-people-are-too-damn-sensitive/</link>
	<description>Because everyone else already has one</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 01 Feb 2012 02:58:07 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael</title>
		<link>http://blog.4d2.org/2008/12/18/fat-people-are-too-damn-sensitive/comment-page-1/#comment-2618</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Dec 2008 18:57:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.4d2.org/?p=768#comment-2618</guid>
		<description>I think it&#039;s just baloney. Black men as a group are no fatter than white men as a group, and the socioeconomic situation in this country is still such that black men as a group are less likely to have jobs requiring them to wear suits than white men as a group.

From a sterile demographics standpoint, I&#039;d expect the situation to be reversed, with a fat black professional being told &quot;go to the Anne Arundel county store where the fat white guys shop.&quot;

So either this kid at the unnamed warehouse-like men&#039;s clothing store was just a dolt, or we start diving into ridiculous generalizations like, &quot;Black guys like to look nice.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think it&#8217;s just baloney. Black men as a group are no fatter than white men as a group, and the socioeconomic situation in this country is still such that black men as a group are less likely to have jobs requiring them to wear suits than white men as a group.</p>
<p>From a sterile demographics standpoint, I&#8217;d expect the situation to be reversed, with a fat black professional being told &#8220;go to the Anne Arundel county store where the fat white guys shop.&#8221;</p>
<p>So either this kid at the unnamed warehouse-like men&#8217;s clothing store was just a dolt, or we start diving into ridiculous generalizations like, &#8220;Black guys like to look nice.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kara</title>
		<link>http://blog.4d2.org/2008/12/18/fat-people-are-too-damn-sensitive/comment-page-1/#comment-2617</link>
		<dc:creator>Kara</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Dec 2008 16:26:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.4d2.org/?p=768#comment-2617</guid>
		<description>Maybe it has to do with technology? Maybe fat, professional, white people are ordering their clothes online, and fat, professional, black people aren&#039;t?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Maybe it has to do with technology? Maybe fat, professional, white people are ordering their clothes online, and fat, professional, black people aren&#8217;t?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael</title>
		<link>http://blog.4d2.org/2008/12/18/fat-people-are-too-damn-sensitive/comment-page-1/#comment-2614</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Dec 2008 10:21:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.4d2.org/?p=768#comment-2614</guid>
		<description>Really? What is this freakish no-fat-white-people phenomenon? Obesity rates are not that much higher for black guys, this must just be some twisted social thing.

Your last sentence made me LOL.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Really? What is this freakish no-fat-white-people phenomenon? Obesity rates are not that much higher for black guys, this must just be some twisted social thing.</p>
<p>Your last sentence made me LOL.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dad</title>
		<link>http://blog.4d2.org/2008/12/18/fat-people-are-too-damn-sensitive/comment-page-1/#comment-2601</link>
		<dc:creator>dad</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Dec 2008 05:07:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.4d2.org/?p=768#comment-2601</guid>
		<description>I really hate to step in this except to say I had a similar experience at a men&#039;s clothing store --- &quot;try our stores in PG county, they have business clothes for fat black men&quot;. I said &quot;excuse me? how is that relevant&quot;. Clerk said &quot;You know --- It&#039;s more acceptable to be fat if you&#039;re black. Fat white guys don&#039;t wear suits. They&#039;re slobs.&quot;  He says this to me - fat white guy me. The data may have supported his theory, but this kid really needs some training. I guess he was an equal opportunity jerk at least, but I won&#039;t go back.  I guarantee it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I really hate to step in this except to say I had a similar experience at a men&#8217;s clothing store &#8212; &#8220;try our stores in PG county, they have business clothes for fat black men&#8221;. I said &#8220;excuse me? how is that relevant&#8221;. Clerk said &#8220;You know &#8212; It&#8217;s more acceptable to be fat if you&#8217;re black. Fat white guys don&#8217;t wear suits. They&#8217;re slobs.&#8221;  He says this to me &#8211; fat white guy me. The data may have supported his theory, but this kid really needs some training. I guess he was an equal opportunity jerk at least, but I won&#8217;t go back.  I guarantee it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael</title>
		<link>http://blog.4d2.org/2008/12/18/fat-people-are-too-damn-sensitive/comment-page-1/#comment-2575</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Dec 2008 13:46:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.4d2.org/?p=768#comment-2575</guid>
		<description>Wow. So &quot;fat chick&quot; goes to Macy&#039;s, can&#039;t find clothes in her size, Macy&#039;s employee tells her straight that Macy&#039;s has chosen not to cater to her size instead of telling her some lie about stock levels, and &lt;em&gt;then&lt;/em&gt; said employee goes above and beyond by suggesting another location where larger clothes may be found -- more likely from personal knowledge than from any particular coaching by her employers. None of this is phrased particularly well, but it&#039;s all the truth and apparently offered in a spirit of helpfulness.

In response, fat chick writes scathing complaint about employee and Macy&#039;s in general, alleging that she has been called fat, poor and low-class.

I dunno about poor, but I do know that beating up on people trying to help you makes you low-class.

And what&#039;s so damned offensive about the demographics anyway? If she&#039;s, say, 30 years old and wears a size 18, then 80% of her peers wear a smaller size than she does, with the most popular sizes being 12 and 14. I think Kara will back me up if I assert that a garment designed for a size 12 and then scaled up to an 18 is probably not going to fit well or look great. The &quot;black Macy&#039;s&quot; probably stocks quite a few entirely different garments, not just bigger sizes of the same stuff. For the &quot;average Macy&#039;s&quot;, stocking larger sizes might mean devoting shelf space to something that&#039;s useful for 20% of their customers versus 80%.

If the sizes at the Macy&#039;s in question truly stopped at 12 as the fat chick claims, that suggests that it isn&#039;t an &quot;average Macy&#039;s&quot; and that their demographic skews in the skinny-white-girl direction, which means it may be even worse than 80/20 for them.

I don&#039;t see how this is anything other than good business. No company is going to be more interested in shaming fat women than in turning a profit.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow. So &#8220;fat chick&#8221; goes to Macy&#8217;s, can&#8217;t find clothes in her size, Macy&#8217;s employee tells her straight that Macy&#8217;s has chosen not to cater to her size instead of telling her some lie about stock levels, and <em>then</em> said employee goes above and beyond by suggesting another location where larger clothes may be found &#8212; more likely from personal knowledge than from any particular coaching by her employers. None of this is phrased particularly well, but it&#8217;s all the truth and apparently offered in a spirit of helpfulness.</p>
<p>In response, fat chick writes scathing complaint about employee and Macy&#8217;s in general, alleging that she has been called fat, poor and low-class.</p>
<p>I dunno about poor, but I do know that beating up on people trying to help you makes you low-class.</p>
<p>And what&#8217;s so damned offensive about the demographics anyway? If she&#8217;s, say, 30 years old and wears a size 18, then 80% of her peers wear a smaller size than she does, with the most popular sizes being 12 and 14. I think Kara will back me up if I assert that a garment designed for a size 12 and then scaled up to an 18 is probably not going to fit well or look great. The &#8220;black Macy&#8217;s&#8221; probably stocks quite a few entirely different garments, not just bigger sizes of the same stuff. For the &#8220;average Macy&#8217;s&#8221;, stocking larger sizes might mean devoting shelf space to something that&#8217;s useful for 20% of their customers versus 80%.</p>
<p>If the sizes at the Macy&#8217;s in question truly stopped at 12 as the fat chick claims, that suggests that it isn&#8217;t an &#8220;average Macy&#8217;s&#8221; and that their demographic skews in the skinny-white-girl direction, which means it may be even worse than 80/20 for them.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t see how this is anything other than good business. No company is going to be more interested in shaming fat women than in turning a profit.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

