<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Using Phrases You Don&#8217;t Understand</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.4d2.org/2008/07/03/using-phrases-you-dont-understand/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.4d2.org/2008/07/03/using-phrases-you-dont-understand/</link>
	<description>Because everyone else already has one</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 20 Nov 2008 16:36:15 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Melissa JG</title>
		<link>http://blog.4d2.org/2008/07/03/using-phrases-you-dont-understand/#comment-587</link>
		<dc:creator>Melissa JG</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Jul 2008 16:45:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.4d2.org/?p=432#comment-587</guid>
		<description>RIGHT ON!

"Intents and/intensive purposes" is one of those things that now that you've mentioned it, I can't remember how i've been doing it. Both seem familiar. Nonetheless, it should be avoided in formal writing, because it's a cliche. Thank you, though, for making sure that I will not make this mistake again. If I ever did. :)

One common one is "premiere" and "premier," which I saw a couple of days ago at the Behnke Nurseries in Potomac (evidently they supplied the "premier of Extreme Makeover" with their new landscaping, the lucky devil). When I worked at the PR office in St. Mary's, we were forever finding this mix-up in the local papers.

I have been burned so many times on the picking-up-new-words-in-a-book-and-not-checking-it thing (or so it feels like, since it is so humiliating). Studying for the GREs last fall showed me what a yutz I have been all along.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>RIGHT ON!</p>
<p>&#8220;Intents and/intensive purposes&#8221; is one of those things that now that you&#8217;ve mentioned it, I can&#8217;t remember how i&#8217;ve been doing it. Both seem familiar. Nonetheless, it should be avoided in formal writing, because it&#8217;s a cliche. Thank you, though, for making sure that I will not make this mistake again. If I ever did. <img src='http://blog.4d2.org/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>One common one is &#8220;premiere&#8221; and &#8220;premier,&#8221; which I saw a couple of days ago at the Behnke Nurseries in Potomac (evidently they supplied the &#8220;premier of Extreme Makeover&#8221; with their new landscaping, the lucky devil). When I worked at the PR office in St. Mary&#8217;s, we were forever finding this mix-up in the local papers.</p>
<p>I have been burned so many times on the picking-up-new-words-in-a-book-and-not-checking-it thing (or so it feels like, since it is so humiliating). Studying for the GREs last fall showed me what a yutz I have been all along.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kara</title>
		<link>http://blog.4d2.org/2008/07/03/using-phrases-you-dont-understand/#comment-586</link>
		<dc:creator>Kara</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Jul 2008 15:20:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.4d2.org/?p=432#comment-586</guid>
		<description>I guess what doesn't make sense to me about "intensive purposes" is that it doesn't really fit into the context of a sentence like, "but for all intensive purposes, I'm a woman." In that context, it makes no sense to me. Well it could make sense if you prefaced it with something like, I don't have breasts but for all intensive purposes, I'm a woman. For example, I still get my period." I don't know, first thing that came to mind.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I guess what doesn&#8217;t make sense to me about &#8220;intensive purposes&#8221; is that it doesn&#8217;t really fit into the context of a sentence like, &#8220;but for all intensive purposes, I&#8217;m a woman.&#8221; In that context, it makes no sense to me. Well it could make sense if you prefaced it with something like, I don&#8217;t have breasts but for all intensive purposes, I&#8217;m a woman. For example, I still get my period.&#8221; I don&#8217;t know, first thing that came to mind.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jess</title>
		<link>http://blog.4d2.org/2008/07/03/using-phrases-you-dont-understand/#comment-585</link>
		<dc:creator>jess</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Jul 2008 15:12:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.4d2.org/?p=432#comment-585</guid>
		<description>I thought it was "intensive purposes" for a long time (well, until late junior high school) -- which DOES make sense to me. Though it's a little different than "intents and purposes." "emphasized purposes"</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I thought it was &#8220;intensive purposes&#8221; for a long time (well, until late junior high school) &#8212; which DOES make sense to me. Though it&#8217;s a little different than &#8220;intents and purposes.&#8221; &#8220;emphasized purposes&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
